ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR STUDY MATERIALS | ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-AUDITOR PRACTICE TESTS

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Tests

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Tests

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Tests, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Technical Training, Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Online, Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor King

Free update for one year after purchasing is available for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study guide, therefore there is no need for you to spend extra money on update version. And the update version for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps will be sent to your email automatically, you just need to check your email for the update version. Besides, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Materials are compiled by experienced experts and, so the quality can be guaranteed. We have online and offline service, and they possess the professional knowledge for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam materials, and if you have any questions, you can consult us.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification is recognized globally as a benchmark for professionals who want to demonstrate their competence in the field of information security management system auditing. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification provides tangible evidence of an individual's expertise and ability to effectively audit and assess the information security management system of an organization, ensuring that it complies with the requirements of the ISO 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is also a valuable asset for professionals looking to advance their careers in the field of information security management, as it demonstrates their commitment to ongoing professional development and their dedication to maintaining the highest standards of excellence in their work.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Tests & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Technical Training

The latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam prep is created by our IT experts and certified trainers who are dedicated to PECB braindumps pdf for a long time. All questions of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF VCE are written based on the real questions. Besides, we always check the updating of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam questions to make sure exam preparation smoothly.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor) certification exam is designed to test an individual's knowledge, skills, and competence to effectively plan and perform an audit of an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is recognized globally and is highly valued by organizations that prioritize information security.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q102-Q107):

NEW QUESTION # 102
Scenario 8: EsBank provides banking and financial solutions to the Estonian banking sector since September 2010. The company has a network of 30 branches with over 100 ATMs across the country.
Operating in a highly regulated industry, EsBank must comply with many laws and regulations regarding the security and privacy of dat a. They need to manage information security across their operations by implementing technical and nontechnical controls. EsBank decided to implement an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001 because it provided better security, more risk control, and compliance with key requirements of laws and regulations.
Nine months after the successful implementation of the ISMS, EsBank decided to pursue certification of their ISMS by an independent certification body against ISO/IEC 27001 .The certification audit included all of EsBank's systems, processes, and technologies.
The stage 1 and stage 2 audits were conducted jointly and several nonconformities were detected. The first nonconformity was related to EsBank's labeling of information. The company had an information classification scheme but there was no information labeling procedure. As a result, documents requiring the same level of protection would be labeled differently (sometimes as confidential, other times sensitive).
Considering that all the documents were also stored electronically, the nonconformity also impacted media handling. The audit team used sampling and concluded that 50 of 200 removable media stored sensitive information mistakenly classified as confidential. According to the information classification scheme, confidential information is allowed to be stored in removable media, whereas storing sensitive information is strictly prohibited. This marked the other nonconformity.
They drafted the nonconformity report and discussed the audit conclusions with EsBank's representatives, who agreed to submit an action plan for the detected nonconformities within two months.
EsBank accepted the audit team leader's proposed solution. They resolved the nonconformities by drafting a procedure for information labeling based on the classification scheme for both physical and electronic formats. The removable media procedure was also updated based on this procedure.
Two weeks after the audit completion, EsBank submitted a general action plan. There, they addressed the detected nonconformities and the corrective actions taken, but did not include any details on systems, controls, or operations impacted. The audit team evaluated the action plan and concluded that it would resolve the nonconformities. Yet, EsBank received an unfavorable recommendation for certification.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which action illustrated in scenario 8 is unacceptable in an external audit?

  • A. The lack of an information labeling procedure existed was marked as a minor nonconformity
  • B. The audit team leader suggested a specific solution on resolving the nonconformities
  • C. Stage 1 audit and stage 2 audits were performed at the same time

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 103
Which option below is correct about the audit plan?

  • A. The audit plan should be flexible to allow for modifications
  • B. The audit plan involves the use of several audit procedures
  • C. The auditee's top management prepares the audit plan

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
B . Correct Answer:
Audit plans must remain flexible to adapt to unforeseen findings and risks.
ISO 19011:2018 specifies that audit planning should allow dynamic adjustments.
A . Incorrect:
Audit procedures are part of execution, not planning.
C . Incorrect:
The audit team, not top management, prepares the audit plan.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4 (Audit Planning Flexibility)


NEW QUESTION # 104
Select the words that best complete the sentence:
To complete the sentence with the word(s) click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the application text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

Answer:

Explanation:


NEW QUESTION # 105
Which controls are related to the Annex A controls of ISO/IEC 27001 and are often selected from other guides and standards or defined by the organization to meet its specific needs?

  • A. Specific controls
  • B. General controls
  • C. Strategic controls

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
Specific controls are tailored security controls chosen based on risk assessments, industry best practices, and regulatory requirements. These align with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A controls, which organizations select based on their risk landscape.
General controls refer to broad security measures that apply to all organizations.
Strategic controls focus on high-level governance and long-term security goals, not detailed security implementations.


NEW QUESTION # 106
You are carrying out your first third-party ISMS surveillance audit as an Audit Team Leader. You are presently in the auditee's data centre with another member of your audit team.
You are currently in a large room that is subdivided into several smaller rooms, each of which has a numeric combination lock and swipe card reader on the door. You notice two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorised electrical repairs.
You go to reception and ask to see the door access record for the client's suite. This indicates only one card was swiped. You ask the receptionist and they reply, "yes it's a common problem. We ask everyone to swipe their cards but with contractors especially, one tends to swipe and the rest simply 'tailgate' their way in" but we know who they are from the reception sign-in.
Based on the scenario above which one of the following actions would you now take?

  • A. Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier
  • B. Take no action. Irrespective of any recommendations, contractors will always act in this way
  • C. Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined
  • D. Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV
  • E. Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.2 'physical entry' as a secure area is not adequately protected
  • F. Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities
  • G. Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times
  • H. Tell the organisation they must write to their contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately

Answer: E

Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), control A.7.2 requires an organization to implement appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas1. The organization should define and document the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, and should monitor and record the use of such access rights1. Therefore, when auditing the organization's application of control A.7.2, an ISMS auditor should verify that these aspects are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should raise a nonconformity against control A.7.2, as the secure area is not adequately protected from unauthorized access. The auditor should provide the following evidence and justification for the nonconformity:
* Evidence: The auditor observed two external contractors using a swipe card and combination number provided by the centre's reception desk to gain access to a client's suite to carry out authorized electrical repairs. The auditor checked the door access record for the client's suite and found that only one card was swiped. The auditor asked the receptionist and was told that it was a common problem that contractors tend to swipe one card and tailgate their way in, but they were known from the reception sign-in.
* Justification: This evidence indicates that the organization has not implemented appropriate physical entry controls to prevent unauthorized access to secure areas, as required by control A.7.2. The organization has not defined and documented the criteria for granting and revoking access rights to secure areas, as there is no verification or authorization process for providing swipe cards and combination numbers to external contractors. The organization has not monitored and recorded the use of access rights to secure areas, as there is no mechanism to ensure that each individual swipes their card and enters their combination number before entering a secure area. The organization has relied on the reception sign-in as a means of identification, which is not sufficient or reliable for ensuring information security.
The other options are not valid actions for auditing control A.7.2, as they are not related to the control or its requirements, or they are not appropriate or effective for addressing the nonconformity. For example:
* Take no action: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformity, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems.
* Raise a nonconformity against control A.5.20 'addressing information security in supplier relationships' as information security requirements have not been agreed upon with the supplier: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not supplier relationships. Control A.5.20 requires an organization to agree on information security requirements with suppliers that may access, process, store, communicate or provide IT infrastructure components for its information assets1. While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security in supplier relationships, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
* Raise a nonconformity against control A.7.6 'working in secure areas' as security measures for working in secure areas have not been defined: This option is not valid because it does not address the root cause of the nonconformity, which is related to physical entry controls, not working in secure areas. Control A.7.6 requires an organization to define and apply security measures for working in secure areas1.
While this control may be relevant for ensuring information security when working in secure areas, it does not address the issue of unauthorized access to secure areas by external contractors.
* Determine whether any additional effective arrangements are in place to verify individual access to secure areas e.g. CCTV: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather attempts to find alternative or compensating controls that may mitigate its
* impact or likelihood. While additional arrangements such as CCTV may be useful for verifying individual access to secure areas, they do not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
* Raise an opportunity for improvement that contractors must be accompanied at all times when accessing secure facilities: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may prevent or reduce its recurrence or severity.
While accompanying contractors at all times when accessing secure facilities may be a good practice for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
* Raise an opportunity for improvement to have a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather suggests a possible improvement action that may increase awareness or compliance with the existing controls. While having a large sign in reception reminding everyone requiring access must use their swipe card at all times may be a helpful reminder for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
* Tell the organisation they must write to their contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately: This option is not valid because it does not address or resolve the nonconformity, but rather instructs the organization to take a corrective action that may not be effective or sufficient for ensuring information security. While writing to contractors, reminding them of the need to use access cards appropriately may be a communication measure for ensuring information security, it does not replace or substitute the requirement for appropriate physical entry controls as specified by control A.7.2.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems


NEW QUESTION # 107
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Practice Tests: https://www.validexam.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-latest-dumps.html

Report this page